Affiliate income has a reputation problem among writers, and it is largely deserved. The version most people have encountered is a bad one: a link dropped into a newsletter for a product nobody uses, paying a few dollars once, in exchange for a small amount of the writer's credibility.
The version that works is structurally different, and the difference is entirely in the words *recurring* and *genuinely useful*. A one-time commission on a product you do not use is a transaction that costs you something. A recurring commission on a tool you were already recommending is closer to being paid for advice you were giving away.
This is how the CanonBoard programme works, in full and without the parts that are usually left for later. What it pays, the three conditions that actually matter, the arithmetic at realistic numbers, and an honest account of who it suits — because for a decent number of writers the answer is nobody, and finding that out here is cheaper than finding it out in front of an audience.
The terms, in full
**30 percent of the base subscription, every month, for life.** Not for twelve months — the window was removed on 31 July 2026. For as long as the person you referred keeps paying, you keep earning. A flat rate, no tiers, no volume thresholds.
**Base subscription only.** Seat add-ons and credit packs are excluded, permanently. A referred account that grows from three seats to eight does not increase your commission, and a hundred dollars of credit packs pays nothing. The rate applies to the plan itself.
**Pro-tier benefit, on both sides of the clock.** You need an active Pro subscription to generate a referral link, and — this is the condition people miss — commission only continues to accrue while your Pro subscription is active. If it lapses, new commission stops on referrals you already made. It resumes if you resubscribe. This is checked at the moment each invoice is paid rather than merely written in the terms, which is worth knowing because the terms claimed it for some time before anything enforced it.
**Referral links only.** There are no coupon codes. Someone who arrives through your link is attributed to you for thirty days, and the attribution is claimed when they create an account. If a referred customer cancels and comes back within three months, attribution resumes and commission continues — there is no clock to reset.
**Manual payouts on request, twenty-five dollar minimum, settled within five business days.** You request from the affiliate hub; the request reserves the specific commissions it covers, so the pending balance you see is always what is genuinely still owed rather than a number that double-counts money already sent. There is no payment-processor account to set up or verify first.
No application. No approval queue. Pro accounts have the hub, and the link works the moment it is generated. Creators featured in a Featurette receive affiliate status automatically.
The arithmetic at real numbers
It is worth doing once, at numbers you might actually reach, because the recurring structure makes small counts behave quite differently from how one-off commissions do.
A referred **Pro** subscription is $30 a month, so it pays you **$9 a month**. A referred **Core** subscription is $7 a month, paying **$2.10 a month**. Annual plans work the same way on the annual invoice.
- **4 Pro referrals** → $36/month. Your own Pro subscription is paid for, with change.
- **10 Pro referrals** → $90/month. Roughly a payout request a fortnight.
- **20 Pro referrals** → $180/month, arriving whether or not you wrote anything that week.
- **50 mixed referrals**, say 20 Pro and 30 Core → $243/month.
The number that matters in that list is not the largest one. It is the first: four referrals covers the subscription, and everything after that is a line of income with no output attached to it. For a writer, that property — money that does not care whether this was a good month — is worth more than the size of it suggests, for the same reasons set out in recurring revenue for writers.
The realistic timeline is slower than the arithmetic implies. Referrals arrive when someone with a genuine problem reads something genuinely useful, which is not a thing you can schedule.
Who it suits, and who it does not
It suits writers who **teach**, in any form. Workshop leaders, people who run courses, people who answer the same craft question forty times a year. A recommendation from someone who has watched a hundred people struggle with continuity is not advertising; it is the actual answer to the question being asked.
It suits writers who **work in public** — process newsletters, worldbuilding threads, campaign logs, anyone whose audience follows how they work as much as what they produce. The tool appears in the work naturally, and the link is a footnote to something that was already useful.
It suits **game masters and community organisers**, whose audiences have the continuity problem acutely and in groups.
It does **not** suit writers who would have to pretend. If you do not use the product, an audience that trusts you will notice, and you will have traded something durable for nine dollars a month. This is not modesty about the programme — it is the arithmetic. A newsletter's credibility is worth more than any plausible commission from it.
And it does not suit anyone hoping it substitutes for an audience. Every route in the wider income map converts an audience into income; none of them creates one. If that is the missing piece, building an audience for your writing is the work that comes first.
Using the link well
The single highest-return placement is **the end of something useful**. A guide, a thread, a teardown of how you keep a series consistent — where the link is the obvious next step for someone who has just been persuaded there is a problem worth solving. A link in a bio converts at approximately nothing, because nobody arrives at a bio with a problem.
**Say it is a referral link.** Every time. The disclosure costs you nothing measurable and its absence costs you the entire relationship if it is noticed, which it eventually is.
**Recommend the tier they need, not the tier that pays.** Pro pays four times what Core does, and recommending Pro to someone who needs Core is how a referral becomes a cancellation in month two — at which point you have earned one commission and lost a reader. A cancelled subscription pays nothing recurring, so the incentive here is actually aligned; it just requires holding your nerve for one month.
**Watch the funnel, not the click count.** The hub shows clicks, signups, and paying conversions as a funnel with both rates. A high click count with no signups usually means the link is landing on people who were not looking for a tool. A high signup count with no conversions usually means the tier expectation was set wrong.
**Give it time before judging it.** The recurring structure means a referral made in month one is still paying in month twenty. Assessing the programme on its first month is assessing the least representative part of it.
Starting
If you are on Pro, the link already exists — generate it from the affiliate hub and put it at the end of the most useful thing you have written about how you work.
If you are on Core or Free, the programme is a Pro benefit, and it is worth being honest about the sequencing: subscribe to Pro because you want the ten seats, the comment threads and the change history, not because of the commission. Four referrals covers it, but four referrals is not a certainty, and buying a plan to unlock a revenue stream that depends on an audience you may not have is the wrong way round.
The full terms are at /affiliate-terms, the programme page is /affiliate, and the other four routes by which a writer gets paid here are mapped in how to make money as a writer on CanonBoard.
Frequently asked questions
- How much does the CanonBoard affiliate programme pay?
- 30 percent of the referred customer's base subscription, every month, for as long as they remain subscribed. It is a flat rate with no tiers and no application. A referred Pro subscription at $30 a month pays $9 a month, indefinitely. Commission is calculated on the base subscription only — seat add-ons and credit packs are excluded permanently.
- Is there a time limit on the commission?
- No. There used to be a twelve-month window; it was removed on 31 July 2026. Commission now recurs for the life of the referred subscription, subject to two conditions: the referred customer stays subscribed, and your own Pro subscription stays active. If your Pro subscription lapses, new commission stops accruing on referrals you already made — this is enforced at the moment each invoice is paid, not merely stated in the terms.
- Who can join the affiliate programme?
- Any account on an active Pro subscription. There is no application to fill in and no approval to wait for — you generate a referral link from your affiliate hub and it works immediately. It is a Pro-tier benefit, so Core accounts do not qualify. Creators featured in a CanonBoard Featurette receive affiliate status automatically.
- How and when do I get paid?
- Payouts are manual and on request. Once your pending commission reaches twenty-five dollars you request a payout from the affiliate hub, and it is settled within five business days. There is no payment-processor account to set up, verify or maintain first, which is the point of doing it this way. Requesting a payout reserves the exact commissions it covers, so the balance you see is always what is genuinely still owed.
- Do I need coupon codes or a discount to offer?
- No. The programme runs on referral links only — there are no coupon codes at all. Someone arriving through your link is attributed to you for thirty days, and the attribution is claimed when they create an account. If a referred customer cancels and returns within three months, attribution resumes and commission continues.
CanonBoard scans your whole world and tells you where it disagrees with itself.
Start free