Every other format has to argue that the world is worth funding on its own, separate from the story told in it. Tabletop does not have that problem. In games the setting is the product. It is the thing being bought, played in, and argued about.
Which makes this the format where audience funding needs the least translation — and, oddly, the one where it is attempted least often.
Why the fit is unusually good
Three conditions have to hold for continuous funding to work well, and tabletop satisfies all three without effort.
- **The audience is already inside the world.** Players are not spectators. They have been generating canon at the table for months, and they are invested in the setting in a way a reader of a novel is not.
- **Paying for setting material is normal.** Supplements, modules, source books. Nobody has to be persuaded that a world is a thing you can buy.
- **Players have opinions about canon, at length.** This is the decisive one. A reader might have a vague preference about what happens next. A player will write you eight hundred words on why a faction should have a schism, unprompted, and mean every word.
That third condition is exactly what backing a specific idea is built for. In most formats you have to coax a pitch out of an audience. In tabletop the pitches already exist — they are in your Discord, and they have been for a year.
The problem this also solves
Long campaigns have a canon problem that has nothing to do with money, and any GM running one past the two-year mark knows it. The setting exists in three incompatible places: your notes, the players' memories, and what actually happened at the table.
By year two the discrepancies are real. A faction was destroyed in one player's recollection and merely humiliated in another's. An NPC has died twice. The map has moved.
A public, structured world is the fix, and it is worth doing whether or not anyone ever funds it. One record everyone can see, with cards for characters, factions, locations, and rules, and a timeline in in-world time. The funding layer then sits on top of a thing you needed anyway — which is the right order for this. Build the record because the campaign requires it; open it to funding because it is already good.
Running it alongside a campaign
The practical shape, for a GM with an existing table and a wider following:
- **Publish the setting, not the session.** Factions, geography, history, rules, the important NPCs. What your players are about to walk into stays in the Locked Vault.
- **Let the wider audience pitch.** People who will never sit at your table still want the world to develop, and they will tell you which parts they want developed.
- **Read backed ideas as demand signals.** If three separate people have put money behind developing the same region, you have learned something useful about what your next supplement should be.
- **Keep the final say, visibly.** Canonization is yours. A funded idea is a suggestion with weight, not an instruction — and being clear about that early prevents the argument later.
Mechanics
On CanonBoard, a published project becomes a Board that anyone can read, follow, and fund — either by backing a specific pitch or by supporting the world directly, both starting at a dollar. CanonBoard takes 10 percent with processing passed through at cost, it is free to open, funding works on the free plan, and payouts go to PayPal at a fifty-dollar threshold. The full guide is here.
Frequently asked questions
- How do tabletop creators fund a homebrew setting?
- By publishing the setting as a public world and letting players and followers support it continuously — either by backing specific ideas for how the world should develop, or by supporting the project directly. Tabletop suits this better than most formats because the setting is the product and players are already invested in its canon.
- Should I publish my campaign's setting if my players read it?
- Publish the setting, not the session. Factions, geography, history, rules, and established NPCs can be public without spoiling anything. Material your players are about to encounter belongs in the Locked Vault, which stays invisible on the public page until you release it.
- Can players pay to change my campaign's canon?
- No. Backing an idea raises its visibility; it does not place it in the setting. Canonization is always the creator's decision and can be declined for any reason. Treating funded ideas as instructions rather than as demand signals is the fastest way to lose authorship of your own world.
CanonBoard scans your whole world and tells you where it disagrees with itself.
Start free